Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Interviews

Tag: Direttiva UE, trasparenza salariale


13 Jan 2026

Salaries: transparency among colleagues becomes mandatory — for equal roles, comparisons between pay slips are now allowed (Corriere Della Sera – Vittorio De Luca, 13 January 2026)

Transposition of the directive by 6 June. Europe says no to the Netherlands, which had requested a postponement. Talks between social partners and the Ministry of Labour

Italy has until 6 June to transpose the EU directive on pay transparency. To the Netherlands, which had asked for a delay, Brussels responded on 18 December with a firm “no.”

Reversal of the burden of proof

Everyone will be entitled to ask what the average pay is of colleagues—women and men—performing work of equal value. The directive provides for a reversal of the burden of proof: it will be up to companies to explain the reasons for pay that is lower than the average. In the event of a dispute, the directive envisages an internal company conciliation mechanism involving trade unions and equality bodies. If this proves insufficient, the matter may be taken to court.

The Ministry of Labour is working on transposing the directive through a legislative decree, with technical support from Inapp. A first meeting has been held with trade unions, followed by a second with all social partners. “We expect that associations like ours, which have direct knowledge of these issues, will also be consulted,” says Vincenzo Di Marco, Lombardy vice-president of Aidp, the association of HR directors.

Positions at the Ministry of Labour negotiating table

At the first meeting of the discussion table at the Ministry of Labour, Confindustria—aligned with the other employers’ associations—put forward two requests. The first was to uphold everything already set out in sectoral collective agreements regarding job grades and roles of equal value. The second was to enhance conciliation procedures in order to minimise litigation before the courts. Overall, these are requests with which the trade unions also largely agree.

Continue reading the full version published on Corriere della Sera.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

15 Apr 2026

Dismissal deemed valid based on a message sent in a WhatsApp chat (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7982 of March 31, 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section) held that a message sent within a private chat may constitute just cause for…

13 Apr 2026

De Luca & Partners, the boutique turns 50 years old (MAG – Legalcommunity, 13 April 2026 – Vincenzo De Luca, Vittorio De Luca e Roberta Padula)

It was 1976 when labor lawyer Vincenzo De Luca decided to open his firm in Milan. He came from Barletta and rented a small office in Largo Corsia…

13 Apr 2026

Organization and algorithms: here are the rights to strengthen (L’Economia, Il Corriere della Sera, 13 April 2026 – Martina De Angeli)

“Artificial intelligence has a significant and direct impact on work organization and on personnel management models.” Martina De Angeli, senior associate at De Luca & Partners, has no…

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…