Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: blocco dei licenziamenti, Licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo


25 Feb 2021

Dismissal for sudden physical unfitness falls within the dismissal prohibition

The Court of Ravenna, in its ruling of 7 January 2021, ordered that a worker’s dismissal for sudden physical unfitness for the role falls within the cases of dismissal for objective justified reason prohibited by the Covid-19 emergency regulations.

Facts of the case

A worker challenged his dismissal for objective justified reason in court. The dismissal was notified to him on 30 April 2020 following a sudden physical unfitness for the role, confirmed by the company physician a few days earlier.  

In its defence, the employer argued that the physical unfitness in question was not covered by the emergency legislation, which only prohibits dismissals of a financial nature in the strict sense.

The Court’s decision

In upholding the action brought by the worker, the Court found that dismissal for sudden physical unfitness for the role fell within the category of dismissals based on objective grounds.

The Court ruled that this case falls within the dismissal prohibition imposed by the legislator to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic. This is because this type of dismissal was covered by the same reasons of economic and social protection that underlie other dismissals that the emergency legislation
sought to prevent.

According to the Court, dismissal must be regarded as a last resort for a worker who is unfit for the job and for whom dismissal cannot be avoided by adopting organisational measures to enable them to continue working, by transferring them to lower duties, if necessary.

In the Court’s view, the respondent company could have carried out such an assessment after the economic downturn caused by the lockdown.

According to a well-established case law, workers who have cannot perform their duties as a result of an accident or illness cannot be dismissed for justified objective reasons if they can be transferred to equivalent or lower duties. In that case, the employer must employ the worker in a different task within the company, according to its organisational structure. Basically, the employer, although not obliged to change its organisational structure, must assign the disabled person tasks compatible with the nature and degree of their impairments and find the job most suited to their health conditions within the company organisation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…