Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: blocco dei licenziamenti, Licenziamento per giustificato motivo oggettivo


25 Feb 2021

Dismissal for sudden physical unfitness falls within the dismissal prohibition

The Court of Ravenna, in its ruling of 7 January 2021, ordered that a worker’s dismissal for sudden physical unfitness for the role falls within the cases of dismissal for objective justified reason prohibited by the Covid-19 emergency regulations.

Facts of the case

A worker challenged his dismissal for objective justified reason in court. The dismissal was notified to him on 30 April 2020 following a sudden physical unfitness for the role, confirmed by the company physician a few days earlier.  

In its defence, the employer argued that the physical unfitness in question was not covered by the emergency legislation, which only prohibits dismissals of a financial nature in the strict sense.

The Court’s decision

In upholding the action brought by the worker, the Court found that dismissal for sudden physical unfitness for the role fell within the category of dismissals based on objective grounds.

The Court ruled that this case falls within the dismissal prohibition imposed by the legislator to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic. This is because this type of dismissal was covered by the same reasons of economic and social protection that underlie other dismissals that the emergency legislation
sought to prevent.

According to the Court, dismissal must be regarded as a last resort for a worker who is unfit for the job and for whom dismissal cannot be avoided by adopting organisational measures to enable them to continue working, by transferring them to lower duties, if necessary.

In the Court’s view, the respondent company could have carried out such an assessment after the economic downturn caused by the lockdown.

According to a well-established case law, workers who have cannot perform their duties as a result of an accident or illness cannot be dismissed for justified objective reasons if they can be transferred to equivalent or lower duties. In that case, the employer must employ the worker in a different task within the company, according to its organisational structure. Basically, the employer, although not obliged to change its organisational structure, must assign the disabled person tasks compatible with the nature and degree of their impairments and find the job most suited to their health conditions within the company organisation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…