Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Riders


27 Jan 2021

Riders: programmed algorithm discrimination

The Court of Bologna, by order of 31 December 2020, upheld the appeal brought by three trade unions confederated to CGIL (Filt, Filcams and Nidl) against the company Deliveroo, describing the access conditions to the digital platform as discriminatory.

According to the Court, the work slots booking system penalised those absent from work, without considering the reasons for their absence. According to the algorithm adopted by the company, the score of each delivery rider was reduced when they (i) did not log in to the platform 15 minutes before the start of the session and went to the work area, or (ii) cancelled the booking session with less than 24 hours’ notice. The system gave priority in the choice of shifts to the most deserving delivery riders (i.e. those with a higher reputation ranking).

According to the judge, the programmed algorithm was completely indifferent to the real needs of delivery riders, and ended up indiscriminately penalising those who had decided, for example, to join a strike or were forced to take time off for illness, disability or to care for a sick or disabled child.

It is based on these assumptions that the Court of Bologna ordered the delivery company to (i) remove the effects of discriminatory conduct, (ii) publish the order on its website and an extract in a national newspaper and (iii) pay € 50,000 to trade unions, for damages because the adopted booking system discouraged workers from collective abstention from work, weakening the trade union action effectiveness.

Other insights related:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…