Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: Riders


27 Jan 2021

Riders: programmed algorithm discrimination

The Court of Bologna, by order of 31 December 2020, upheld the appeal brought by three trade unions confederated to CGIL (Filt, Filcams and Nidl) against the company Deliveroo, describing the access conditions to the digital platform as discriminatory.

According to the Court, the work slots booking system penalised those absent from work, without considering the reasons for their absence. According to the algorithm adopted by the company, the score of each delivery rider was reduced when they (i) did not log in to the platform 15 minutes before the start of the session and went to the work area, or (ii) cancelled the booking session with less than 24 hours’ notice. The system gave priority in the choice of shifts to the most deserving delivery riders (i.e. those with a higher reputation ranking).

According to the judge, the programmed algorithm was completely indifferent to the real needs of delivery riders, and ended up indiscriminately penalising those who had decided, for example, to join a strike or were forced to take time off for illness, disability or to care for a sick or disabled child.

It is based on these assumptions that the Court of Bologna ordered the delivery company to (i) remove the effects of discriminatory conduct, (ii) publish the order on its website and an extract in a national newspaper and (iii) pay € 50,000 to trade unions, for damages because the adopted booking system discouraged workers from collective abstention from work, weakening the trade union action effectiveness.

Other insights related:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…