Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: accordo, CCNL, Riders


30 Sep 2020

National Collective Bargaining Agreement, but Riders remain “self-employed”

On 15 September 2020, the ASSODELIVERY and UGL-RIDER trade associations signed the first National Collective Bargaining Agreement governing the work contracts of Bike Delivery Riders, also known as “Riders”.

Regardless of any remark as to trade representation issues currently bringing about considerable debate, the agreement, called “National Collective Bargaining Agreement for governing the delivery of goods on behalf of third parties, carried out by self-employed workers, the so-called Riders”, has been reached after almost a year following the entering into force of Law No. 128/2019 introducing the first measures for the protection of “gig economy” workers.

Riders have agreements which, according to the signatories, must be traced back to the scope of self-employment. Indeed, article 7 of the National Collective Bargaining Agreement defines riders as “self-employed workers who, based on a contract with one or more platforms, decides whether to render its own delivery services for the goods ordered through the relevant application”.

Amongst the main measures provided, one may count the acknowledgment of a minimum guaranteed fee, bonus systems, safety equipment, insurance coverage, prohibition to discriminate and equal opportunities, personal data protection and trade union rights excluding, at the same time, the typical institutions of employment from arising such as, for instance, remuneration for overtime, additional monthly payments, annual leave, severance pay.

Let us discuss the main institutions in detail.

Pay

As regards those aspects of economic nature, the National Collective Bargaining Agreement foresees the acknowledgment of a minimum fee (Euro 10 per hour) to riders, calculated based on the “estimated” time for making deliveries which, if less than an hour, shall be thus re-parameterised in proportion to the “estimated” time for delivery. Such fee shall in no way be less than Euro 7 for the first 4 months as from commencement of the delivery service in a new city.

Furthermore, the fee shall be increased to a variable extent from 10% to 20% depending on whether the activity is carried out during night hours (from 0:00 to 7:00), holidays (amongst which Sundays are not included) or during the days in which the weather conditions are “bad”.

Instead, to motivate bike delivery riders the National Collective Bargaining Agreement introduces a bonus system pursuant to which the companies must acknowledge a lump-sum bonus to each Rider equal to Euro 600 each 2000 deliveries throughout the solar year (up to a maximum of Euro 1,500 per solar year).

Health and safety at work

The agreement does not only govern economic aspects, but also aims at protecting the health and safety of bike delivery riders, ensuring them that the provisions under the Health and Safety Consolidation Act under Legislative Decree No. 81/2008 are applied to them and that they participate to specific training courses.

Pursuant to the National Collective Bargaining Agreement, delivery companies must provide Riders with safety equipment, such as high visibility clothing and a helmet, to be replaced with fixed regular intervals.

Finally, by “regulating” a practice which is already spread in part, the principal must take out insurance coverage for any accident at work and professional illness, as well as for any possible damage to things or people caused in carrying out the respective activity.

Withdrawal

Finally, in so far as the termination of the agreement is concerned, Riders are entitled to unilaterally withdraw from the contract at any time with immediate effect, whilst the principal is requested to abide by a withdrawal notice of at least 30 days (save for the case of breach of contract for wilful misconduct or gross negligence) or, alternatively, to grant them with an allowance equal to half the remuneration received.  

Others Insights related:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…