Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: relazioni industriali


28 Apr 2022

CBA – Tacit acceptance and acceptance by conduct (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 159 Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

In ruling no. 95/2022, the Court of Vicenza held that the acceptance of a collective agreement may be tacit or by conduct, i.e., by actually applying its terms. Once a party can be said to have accepted the agreement, this is binding on such party. In the case at issue, three labour organisations had sued two companies, arguing that they had applied the UNIC CBA until September 2021, and its effective period had been extended to June 30, 2023. In the view of these organisations, the fact that the two companies stopped using the CBA and replaced it with another one from October 2021 constituted anti-union behaviour. According to the Court, evidence emerged during the proceedings that one of the companies had applied the CCNL by conduct, thus accepting the clause under which “the agreement as a whole shall be understood to be renewed year by year unless terminated six months before its expiration, by a registered letter with return receipt. If terminated, it shall remain force until replaced with the subsequent one”. Accordingly, in the Court’s view, the company’s intent to stop applying the CBA can only produce effects from 30 June 2023, so that the same remains in full effect until that date.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…