Categories: Insights, Legislation


31 Aug 2016

Self-employment and remote working: new text approved

At the meeting of 22 July 2016, the Senate Employment Commission approved the «new» text for the draft bill relating to self-employment and remote working, with significant amendments to the text submitted by the government in 2015. Regarding self-employment, the regulations will also apply to working relations with special provisions pursuant to section 2222 of the Civil Code, originally excluded. The measures applicable to self-employment will include those already applied to the abuse of economic dependency and Job Centers will also seek opportunities for the self-employed. In relation to remote working, it will be possible to establish this type of work by an agreement between the parties and must be carried out partially on company premises and, without a fixed work station, partially outside the company, within the limits of the maximum working hours per day and per week allowed by the law and the collective employment agreement. The remote working agreement shall be in writing «to meet administrative needs and to provide proof», and must specify «the technical and organizational means for ensuring that the worker can be disconnected from the technological tools required for work». In the case of disabled workers, notice of termination of employment by the employer shall be no less than 90 days in order to enable «sufficient reorganization of the worker according to his/her life and treatment needs». Finally, agile workers will have the right to lifelong learning, formally, non-formally and informally, and to the regular certification of their skills. Definitive approval by the Senate is expected in September with the bill becoming law thereafter.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…