Categories: Insights, Publications


10 Dec 2018

231 Organisation and Management Model Update (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 128 – Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Luciano Vella)

Legislative Decree 231/2001 introduced for the first time into the Italian legal system the possibility for a corporation to be fined (monetarily and with disqualification penalties) when specific offences (predicate offences) are committed – to its own advantage or in its interest – by top managers or their subordinates. However, the Decree includes an exonerating exemption: the corporation is not liable if it can prove to have implemented and adopted effectively – before the offence was committed – an organisational, management and control model (the “Model”) suitable to prevent offences of the same type as the one that took place. In any case, the Model is a tool destined by its nature to change and in order to have exonerating power, it must be updated any time there are changes within the organisational structure of the Company (such as, for example, opening of a new office or extension of the corporate purpose) or if the lawmakers introduce new types of offences. By express legislative provision, the effective implementation of the Model, and consequently its subsequent amendments, are the responsibility of the Managing Body. Instead, the constant updating of the Model must be entrusted to the Supervisory Body. On this matter, Confidustria’s guidelines dated 2014, in fact, specifically specified that the Supervisory Body must be assigned the task to ensure updating of the Model every time its reviews so require.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…