Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Corte di Cassazione, Dismissal, Infortunio sul lavoro


26 Aug 2024

Accident at work: employer’s liability is not limited by appointment of a supervisor

In relation to accidents at work, the appointment of a supervisor is not sufficient to avoid the employer’s conviction. This was established by the Italian Court of Cassation, Criminal Section, judgment of 10 June 2024, no. 23049.

The Italian Court of Cassation clarified that the employer must exercise reasonable vigilance to prevent the establishment of practices contrary to the law that may endanger workers. Therefore, in the event of an accident or injury, the employer’s ignorance does not exclude his or her fault for failure to monitor the supervisor’s conduct.

The facts

In the case before the Court, a worker suffered serious and permanent injuries as a result of the use of chemical reagents while cleaning machinery. In carrying out this activity it appeared that the worker was not equipped with adequate protective equipment and had not received the necessary training.

The first instance Court convicted the employer, finding a causal link between the negligent conduct and the criminal event and stressing that the injurious event could have been avoided by appointing a person with more experience as the supervisor.

The Italian Court of Appeal, overturning the first instance judgment, on the one hand acquitted the employer observing that the supervisor had proven experience, and was therefore appropriate for the tasks and role assigned to him and, on the other, characterised the worker’s conduct as eccentric and unpredictable.

The Italian Court of Cassation’s decision

The Italian Court of Cassation, quashed the Court of Appeal’s decision. The Italian Court of Cassation held that the Court of Appeal had not taken into account the fact that the worker involved had not received adequate training, and noted that, given the nature of his duties, he should not have been involved in activities involving the use of chemicals.

The Italian Court of Cassation also stated that for safety purposes the employer is required to ensure proper training of workers regardless of the operational experience they may have acquired over time and held the employer liable for failure to supervise the supervisor’s work.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

6 Feb 2026

Pay equity and transparency: draft implementing decree presented

Italy is among the first Member States to have adopted the draft implementing legislative decree of EU Directive 2023/970, which yesterday received its initial approval from the Council…

30 Jan 2026

A conviction for stalking can justify dismissal for just cause

With Ordinance No. 32952 of 17 December 2025, the Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, ruled that a final conviction for stalking and abuse can justify dismissal for just…

30 Jan 2026

We continue to be a Great Place to Work!

For the third consecutive year, De Luca & Partners has been awarded the prestigious Great Place to Work® certification, a significant recognition of the value we place on…

29 Jan 2026

Italian Supreme Court: Employer Monitoring and the Use of Corporate Chats for Disciplinary Purposes

Corporate chats “intended for work-related communications by employees accessing them through company accounts constitute work tools, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 2, of Law No. 300 of 1970,…

28 Jan 2026

Anti-union conduct: the Supreme Court moves beyond formalism and focuses on substance

With order no. 789 of 14 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of anti-union conduct by employers in relation to information and consultation obligations on…

27 Jan 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the use of artificial intelligence may justify a dismissal for objective justified reason?

With Judgment No. 9135 of November 19, 2025, the Labour Section of the Court of Rome held that the dismissal for objective justified reason (i.e. “giustificato motivo oggettivo”,…