Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: certificato A1, distacco, INPS


28 Feb 2020

Regularity of contributions for the posted employee holding the A1 certificate

The territorially competent Court, by judgment No. 106/2019 published on 3 February 2020, stated that the existence of A1 certificates creates a presumption of regularity of contributions of the posted worker.

The facts

An Airline company whose registered office is outside Italy brought an action before the Italian National Social Security Institute (‘INPS’), as it received a single inspection report contesting the non-payment of social security contributions in Italy for 31 employees.

In particular, the INPS, recalling the principle of the lex loci laboris for which workers employed in the territory of a Member State must be subject to the legislation of that State, objected that:

  • the Airline has its base of operations at the site of an Airport located in Italy;
  • the workers posted to that airport reside and have always resided permanently in Italy;
  • the employment contracts for posted personnel indicated the Italian premises of the Airport as well as the working hours of the said personnel. According to the INPS, in this context, the issuing of the A1 forms by the Authority of the Country in which the airline is based is irrelevant.

The decision of the Court

The judge hearing the case upheld the Airline’s appeal, following the European case law produced by the same company, according to which: the existence of A1 certificates creates a presumption of regularity of contributions of the posted worker.

The Judge, in arguing their decision, proceeded to say that the INPS has no jurisdiction to rule on the whether or not the A1 certificates are valid.

According to the Judge, on the basis of European law, the only instrument recognised to the social security institution is the dialogue and conciliation procedure, according to which the aforementioned should have previously contacted the Authority of the foreign country to put it in a position to assess how correct the A1 forms issued were.

In the event of failure to reach agreement, the INPS should have referred the matter to the European Administrative Commission, which, in spite of the forms, has nevertheless charged the contribution omitted in Italy.

In view of the above, the Judge of first instance declared the claim brought by INPS unfounded, by offsetting the costs of the proceedings.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…