Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Press review

Tag: Dismissal, Lavoro Agile


22 Feb 2024

Effects of Italy’s accession to the Framework Agreement

On 28 December 2023, Italy joined the European Framework Agreement called “Framework Agreement on the application of Article 16 (1) of Regulation (EC) No. 883/2004 in cases of habitual cross-border Telework”.  

Article 1 of the Framework Agreement defines “cross-border telework” as an activity that a worker carries out remotely in one or more Member States through the use of information technologies. 

The agreement provides that cross-border teleworkers may be subject to the social security system of the Member State of the employer’s registered office, provided that the work carried out under the “teleworking” regime in the State of residence is less than 50% of the total working time. 

This regime applies only if the worker’s State of residence and the one in which the employer has its registered office are both signatories to the Framework Agreement. Therefore, if those States have not signed such a Framework Agreement, the provisions of Article 13 et seq. of Regulation (EC) No. 883/2004, which provide for the application of the social security system of the Member State of residence if the worker carries out a substantial part of his or her activity in that State, apply. 

Where the conditions set out in the Framework Agreement are met, to derogate from the general provisions established at European level regarding the identification of the applicable legislation, it will be necessary to initiate a special request procedure under Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No. 987/2009. This procedure must be undertaken before the competent authority of the Member State in which the employed worker asks to apply the legislation which, in the case of Italy, is the Italian National Social Security Entity (Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale ‘INPS’). 

Finally, it should be noted that requests submitted up to 30 June 2024 may retroactively cover a period of up to twelve months prior to that of the request. 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…