Categories: Insights, Case Law


30 Oct 2017

Ancillary criteria for the qualification of a labour relationship as employment

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 23846 filed on 11 October 2017, intervened on the qualification of a self-employment relationship as employment. In the specific case, the Court of Cassation stated that subjugation to managerial and disciplinary power cannot be an exclusive criterion to determine whether employment is or is not occurring. This is because, based on the type of task assigned to the worker and the context in which the service is carried out, other characteristics pertaining to the relationship must also be assessed. In ruling, the Court of Cassation followed a consolidated trend on the basis of which, if it is not possible to use as the sole criterion the subjugation of the employee to the managerial, organisational and disciplinary power [of the employer], it is possible to make use of distinctive ancillary criteria such as: (i) continuity and duration of the relationship; (ii) methods of remuneration payment; (iii) work time regulations; (iv) existence of a self-organization power of the employee. And in this case, it was clear that, contrary to the adopted nomen iuris, (a) the work was carried out on company premises, according to predetermined work schedules and subdivided into shifts established by the employer; (b) the services were performed according to a timetable which the workers, once accepted the shift, had to respect; (c) in the event of unavailability, the workers were required to give prior notice to the employer; (d) they had no personal equipment and did not incur any financial risk, since their remuneration was guaranteed; (e) the worker who was unable to go to work had to inform in advance. Specifically, in this context, the Court stated that the absence of disciplinary power could not per se lead to the denial of an employment relationship, with particular reference to standardised services, subjected to continuous checks and direct corrective measures which leave little room for its implementation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…