Categories: Insights, Case Law


30 Oct 2017

Ancillary criteria for the qualification of a labour relationship as employment

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 23846 filed on 11 October 2017, intervened on the qualification of a self-employment relationship as employment. In the specific case, the Court of Cassation stated that subjugation to managerial and disciplinary power cannot be an exclusive criterion to determine whether employment is or is not occurring. This is because, based on the type of task assigned to the worker and the context in which the service is carried out, other characteristics pertaining to the relationship must also be assessed. In ruling, the Court of Cassation followed a consolidated trend on the basis of which, if it is not possible to use as the sole criterion the subjugation of the employee to the managerial, organisational and disciplinary power [of the employer], it is possible to make use of distinctive ancillary criteria such as: (i) continuity and duration of the relationship; (ii) methods of remuneration payment; (iii) work time regulations; (iv) existence of a self-organization power of the employee. And in this case, it was clear that, contrary to the adopted nomen iuris, (a) the work was carried out on company premises, according to predetermined work schedules and subdivided into shifts established by the employer; (b) the services were performed according to a timetable which the workers, once accepted the shift, had to respect; (c) in the event of unavailability, the workers were required to give prior notice to the employer; (d) they had no personal equipment and did not incur any financial risk, since their remuneration was guaranteed; (e) the worker who was unable to go to work had to inform in advance. Specifically, in this context, the Court stated that the absence of disciplinary power could not per se lead to the denial of an employment relationship, with particular reference to standardised services, subjected to continuous checks and direct corrective measures which leave little room for its implementation.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

6 Feb 2026

Pay equity and transparency: draft implementing decree presented

Italy is among the first Member States to have adopted the draft implementing legislative decree of EU Directive 2023/970, which yesterday received its initial approval from the Council…

30 Jan 2026

A conviction for stalking can justify dismissal for just cause

With Ordinance No. 32952 of 17 December 2025, the Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, ruled that a final conviction for stalking and abuse can justify dismissal for just…

30 Jan 2026

We continue to be a Great Place to Work!

For the third consecutive year, De Luca & Partners has been awarded the prestigious Great Place to Work® certification, a significant recognition of the value we place on…

29 Jan 2026

Italian Supreme Court: Employer Monitoring and the Use of Corporate Chats for Disciplinary Purposes

Corporate chats “intended for work-related communications by employees accessing them through company accounts constitute work tools, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 2, of Law No. 300 of 1970,…

28 Jan 2026

Anti-union conduct: the Supreme Court moves beyond formalism and focuses on substance

With order no. 789 of 14 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of anti-union conduct by employers in relation to information and consultation obligations on…

27 Jan 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the use of artificial intelligence may justify a dismissal for objective justified reason?

With Judgment No. 9135 of November 19, 2025, the Labour Section of the Court of Rome held that the dismissal for objective justified reason (i.e. “giustificato motivo oggettivo”,…