Categories: Insights, Case Law


3 Dec 2015

European Court of Justice: interpretation of the directive on collective redundancies

The Court of Justice of the European Union, with sentence no. C-422/14 of 11 November 2015, intervened on two central points of the European directive on collective redundancies (98/59/EC). In this case (i) the calculation criteria for company size which makes the law governing collective redundancies applicable and (ii) the notion of redundancy useful for determining the numeric limit above which the directive on collective redundancies applies. In terms of the first point, the Court observed that, for the purposes of calculating the number of employees for application of the directive on collective redundancies, that workers employed for a fixed term form part of “normally employed workers”. In terms of the second point, the Court established that for the calculation of the five redundancies “any termination of the employment contract not desired by the worker and, thus, without his consent” is considered a redundancy, including resignations submitted by an employee due to unilateral changes made by the employer to an essential element of the employment contract for reasons not related to that individual worker. The impact of this ruling on Italian law will be mitigated in terms of the first point, since the Jobs Act requires that the calculation of employees . for the purposes of applying any legal or contractual provision – must take into account workers employed under a contract for a fixed term, by applying a specific calculation criteria (article 27 Legislative Decree 81/2015). The repercussions regarding the second point could be significant, since dismissals, according to our laws, even if for “just cause” have always been excluded from the calculation of the numeric threshold for application of the aforesaid law.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…