Categories: Insights, Case Law

Tag: gig economy, Riders, Tribunale di Milano


30 Jul 2018

Even for the Court of Milan food-riders are self-employed

The “battle” on the type of employment relationship of the so-called riders in the age of the gig economy continues. A few months after the judgement issued by the Court of Turin ruling that the six riders of Foodora could not be deemed employees of the company, the Court of Milan ruled on 4 July on a similar case, rejecting the appeal of a former rider who claimed an employment relationship with another company in the food distribution sector. The reasons of the judgement have not yet been filed, and thus it will be necessary to wait for them to find out if they are in line with what has already been ruled by the Court of Turin. In said case, the relationship was qualified as a self-employed relationship, since the Foodora riders were not obligated to provide the service and were not under the direction and organisational control of the employer. In fact, in order to exclude a position of employment, the actual methods used to implement that work relationship became relevant, managed through digital platform and a smartphone app. The matter in these past few days has become the topic of wide political and union debate to the point that on 18 July 2018 the first draft related to the financial and regulatory understanding governing riders has been signed. This took place with an understanding signed by Confetra, Fedit, Assologistica, Federspedi, Confartigianato trasporti, Fita – CNA, Filt CGIL, Fit CISL and Uiltrasporti within the logistics National Collective Bargaining Agreement (CCNL).

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…