Categories: Insights, Case Law


27 Aug 2017

Five-year statute of limitations on contributions credit

The Court of Lodi, with judgement No. 99 filed on 6 July 2017, verified that the statute of limitations applied to a credit on a tax payment notice. Specifically, a company that had filed a written appeal registered in February 2017 and duly notified to INAIL, went to Court so as it could declare the credit related to a tax payment slip notified in May 2004 subjected to the statute of limitations. At the outcome of the proceedings, the Judge in charge of the case deemed the request of the petitioning party well grounded, referring to the recent judgement of the Plenary Sitting of the Court of Cassation. The latter, to settle the dispute on the matter, declared that the statute of limitations on contributions is five years even in the case of absence of opposition to the payment notice (judgement No. 23397 dated 17 November 2016). The Plenary Sitting in fact, noted that the deadline – peremptory without challenge – to file an opposition to a payment notice as per article 24, paragraph 5 of Italian Legislative Decree No. 46 dated 1999, even if causing the impossibility to file an appeal, only produces the substantial effect of the irrevocability of the contributions credit without causing also the so-called “conversion” of the brief statute of limitations (in this case, five years, according to article 3, paragraphs 9 and 10, of Italian Law No. 335 dated 1995) into the ordinary one (ten years), pursuant to article  2953 of Italian Civil Code. The latter applies only if the judicial order has become final, while the aforementioned notice, being administrative in nature, does not meet the requirements to acquire a res judicata effect. Based on what was ruled by the Plenary Sitting, the Court stated that the statute of limitations has never been interrupted by the Agency, thus ruling in favour of the appealing company with assignment of compensation of legal expenses.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…