Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Mar 2017

Retrocession to the Client of the contracted company may mean a corporate transfer as per article 2112 of the Italian Civil Code

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 6770 of 15 March 2017, overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal of Rome establishing a contraris that, the retrocession to the Client company of the contracted services does not exclude the possibility that a corporate transfer may occur according to article 2112 of the Italian Civil Code. This would happen when such retrocession would imply a transfer of assets, including personnel, such to make possible the carrying out of a specific business activity. Supporting such assumption, the Cassation – in addition to drawing from its own principles originating from previous judgements it issued- recalled a number of rulings of the European Court of Justice where the judges had identified as an element necessary for the existence of a corporate transfer the fact that the economic entity in question would maintain its identity independently from the change of the effective owner and, therefore, from the instruments used for the succession in the underlying legal relationships. Therefore, in the case of a transfer of an organized group of assets from an entrepreneur to another, a corporate transfer will occur according to article 2112 of the Italian Civil Code inasmuch as the economic entity transferred – as a consequence of its transfer and independently of the legal instrument adopted – maintains its identity and is such to allow the continuation or the resumption of its management. This is valid also in the case when an organised group of assets is constituted solely by a group of employees.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…