Categories: Insights, Case Law


26 Mar 2017

Retrocession to the Client of the contracted company may mean a corporate transfer as per article 2112 of the Italian Civil Code

The Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 6770 of 15 March 2017, overturned the decision of the Court of Appeal of Rome establishing a contraris that, the retrocession to the Client company of the contracted services does not exclude the possibility that a corporate transfer may occur according to article 2112 of the Italian Civil Code. This would happen when such retrocession would imply a transfer of assets, including personnel, such to make possible the carrying out of a specific business activity. Supporting such assumption, the Cassation – in addition to drawing from its own principles originating from previous judgements it issued- recalled a number of rulings of the European Court of Justice where the judges had identified as an element necessary for the existence of a corporate transfer the fact that the economic entity in question would maintain its identity independently from the change of the effective owner and, therefore, from the instruments used for the succession in the underlying legal relationships. Therefore, in the case of a transfer of an organized group of assets from an entrepreneur to another, a corporate transfer will occur according to article 2112 of the Italian Civil Code inasmuch as the economic entity transferred – as a consequence of its transfer and independently of the legal instrument adopted – maintains its identity and is such to allow the continuation or the resumption of its management. This is valid also in the case when an organised group of assets is constituted solely by a group of employees.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…