Categories: Insights, Case Law


29 Nov 2016

The employment requirement must be considered only with respect to the national territory

With ruling no. 19557 dated 30 September 2016, the Supreme Court stated that in the case of a foreign company with a branch office in Italy – in order to determine whether or not the size requisite for application of section 18 of Law no. 300/1970 in the event of unfair dismissal applies – only the workers employed in the national territory will be taken into account, and not the total number of employees in other countries where the Company operates. In the case in question, an employee of a Dutch company, who was dismissed for just cause, applied to the Court against its employer’s dismissal, with consequent application of the protection set forth by section 18 of the Workers’ Statute, alleging that both the workers employed in Italy and those employed in Holland in the employment base should be taken into account. Starting from two opposite positions adopted in case law, the Supreme Court reached the conclusion that even if the sub office or branch office of a foreign company does not have an independent legal status with respect to the parent-company from a corporate point of view, it is however subject to Italian law as though it had been incorporated in Italy in terms of the employment requisite. The reason for this is that section 18 of the Workers’ Statute indeed suggests territorial and national parameters. If the parent company has one or more branch offices in Italy, only the total number of employees of such branch offices should be calculated in terms of the applicability or otherwise of the actual stability regime.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…