Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Directive, Whistelblowing


4 Nov 2019

Whistleblowing: Italian law and EU Directive compared

On 7 October 2019, the European Council adopted the Directive on the “Protection of individuals who report breaches of EU law (known as whistleblowers), i.e. those within the territory of the European Union who report misconduct of which they have become aware in the workplace.

Member States of the Union have two years from the forthcoming date of publication of the Directive in the Official Journal of the European Union, in order to transpose the EU regulations into national law.

The measure aims to harmonise, within the European Union, the regulations on whistleblowing, giving all countries the opportunity to model their national legislation on the basis of best international standards and practices.

In this context, Italian Law 179/2017 will be affected by numerous changes.

Comparison between Italian legislation and the EU Directive

The first aspect intended to be amended concerns the scope. Whilst the Italian law applies only to companies that have adopted management and control models (so called “Organisational Model 231”), the Directive concerns all private companies with more than 50 employees or an annual turnover exceeding €10 million (irrespective, therefore, of the application of Model 231). Small- and medium-sized enterprises are therefore exempted, with the exception of those operating in high-risk sectors (e.g. financial risk or money laundering risk). As regards the public sector, the EU directive leaves it up to the Member States to exempt municipalities with less than ten thousand inhabitants and public bodies with less than fifty employees.

The directive also broadens the scope of protected subjects, including, not only employees, but also self-employed workers, freelancers, consultants, contractors, suppliers, volunteers, trainees, etc. Protection is also extended to informants’ family members and colleagues.

Public authorities and companies receiving a report are required to follow up within three months, otherwise the reporter shall be entitled to publish the information (e.g. via the internet or social media).

In addition, as regards the Italian legislation that refers to “information channels”, the directive provides for the appointment of a company contact person (department or person) responsible for receiving the report to be verified within three months.

The European Directive also covers the sectors subject to reporting. Whilst in Italian legislation the areas covered by the reports concern the offences referred to in Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 (i.e.., “alleged offences”), the European directive, on the other hand, includes additional sectors, such as public procurement, financial services, privacy and data protection, etc.

Lastly, as regards anonymous reports, whilst in Italy, in the public sector, the identification of the reporter is foreseen and, in the private sector, anonymous reports are permitted, the Directive allows for anonymity, leaving it up to the Member States to decide whether public bodies and authorities are obliged to accept these types of alerts.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…