Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Directive, Whistelblowing


4 Nov 2019

Whistleblowing: Italian law and EU Directive compared

On 7 October 2019, the European Council adopted the Directive on the “Protection of individuals who report breaches of EU law (known as whistleblowers), i.e. those within the territory of the European Union who report misconduct of which they have become aware in the workplace.

Member States of the Union have two years from the forthcoming date of publication of the Directive in the Official Journal of the European Union, in order to transpose the EU regulations into national law.

The measure aims to harmonise, within the European Union, the regulations on whistleblowing, giving all countries the opportunity to model their national legislation on the basis of best international standards and practices.

In this context, Italian Law 179/2017 will be affected by numerous changes.

Comparison between Italian legislation and the EU Directive

The first aspect intended to be amended concerns the scope. Whilst the Italian law applies only to companies that have adopted management and control models (so called “Organisational Model 231”), the Directive concerns all private companies with more than 50 employees or an annual turnover exceeding €10 million (irrespective, therefore, of the application of Model 231). Small- and medium-sized enterprises are therefore exempted, with the exception of those operating in high-risk sectors (e.g. financial risk or money laundering risk). As regards the public sector, the EU directive leaves it up to the Member States to exempt municipalities with less than ten thousand inhabitants and public bodies with less than fifty employees.

The directive also broadens the scope of protected subjects, including, not only employees, but also self-employed workers, freelancers, consultants, contractors, suppliers, volunteers, trainees, etc. Protection is also extended to informants’ family members and colleagues.

Public authorities and companies receiving a report are required to follow up within three months, otherwise the reporter shall be entitled to publish the information (e.g. via the internet or social media).

In addition, as regards the Italian legislation that refers to “information channels”, the directive provides for the appointment of a company contact person (department or person) responsible for receiving the report to be verified within three months.

The European Directive also covers the sectors subject to reporting. Whilst in Italian legislation the areas covered by the reports concern the offences referred to in Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 (i.e.., “alleged offences”), the European directive, on the other hand, includes additional sectors, such as public procurement, financial services, privacy and data protection, etc.

Lastly, as regards anonymous reports, whilst in Italy, in the public sector, the identification of the reporter is foreseen and, in the private sector, anonymous reports are permitted, the Directive allows for anonymity, leaving it up to the Member States to decide whether public bodies and authorities are obliged to accept these types of alerts.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…