Categories: Insights, Legislation

Tag: Directive, Whistelblowing


4 Nov 2019

Whistleblowing: Italian law and EU Directive compared

On 7 October 2019, the European Council adopted the Directive on the “Protection of individuals who report breaches of EU law (known as whistleblowers), i.e. those within the territory of the European Union who report misconduct of which they have become aware in the workplace.

Member States of the Union have two years from the forthcoming date of publication of the Directive in the Official Journal of the European Union, in order to transpose the EU regulations into national law.

The measure aims to harmonise, within the European Union, the regulations on whistleblowing, giving all countries the opportunity to model their national legislation on the basis of best international standards and practices.

In this context, Italian Law 179/2017 will be affected by numerous changes.

Comparison between Italian legislation and the EU Directive

The first aspect intended to be amended concerns the scope. Whilst the Italian law applies only to companies that have adopted management and control models (so called “Organisational Model 231”), the Directive concerns all private companies with more than 50 employees or an annual turnover exceeding €10 million (irrespective, therefore, of the application of Model 231). Small- and medium-sized enterprises are therefore exempted, with the exception of those operating in high-risk sectors (e.g. financial risk or money laundering risk). As regards the public sector, the EU directive leaves it up to the Member States to exempt municipalities with less than ten thousand inhabitants and public bodies with less than fifty employees.

The directive also broadens the scope of protected subjects, including, not only employees, but also self-employed workers, freelancers, consultants, contractors, suppliers, volunteers, trainees, etc. Protection is also extended to informants’ family members and colleagues.

Public authorities and companies receiving a report are required to follow up within three months, otherwise the reporter shall be entitled to publish the information (e.g. via the internet or social media).

In addition, as regards the Italian legislation that refers to “information channels”, the directive provides for the appointment of a company contact person (department or person) responsible for receiving the report to be verified within three months.

The European Directive also covers the sectors subject to reporting. Whilst in Italian legislation the areas covered by the reports concern the offences referred to in Legislative Decree no. 231/2001 (i.e.., “alleged offences”), the European directive, on the other hand, includes additional sectors, such as public procurement, financial services, privacy and data protection, etc.

Lastly, as regards anonymous reports, whilst in Italy, in the public sector, the identification of the reporter is foreseen and, in the private sector, anonymous reports are permitted, the Directive allows for anonymity, leaving it up to the Member States to decide whether public bodies and authorities are obliged to accept these types of alerts.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…