Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: danno non patrimoniale, tassazione


25 Feb 2021

Non-pecuniary damage to professionalism does not constitute income subject to taxation (Il Quotidiano del lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 23 February 2021 – Vittorio De Luca, Antonella Iacobellis)

The Court of Cassation, February 3, 2021, no. 2472 ruled that the non-pecuniary damage to professionalism must be traced back to the emerging damage and, as such, not concurrent with the formation of taxable employment income pursuant to art. 49, co. 1, TUIR.

The subjection of the sums to tax and social security contributions must be sought in the indications provided by art. 6, co. 2, TUIR, according to which: “The proceeds obtained in replacement of income, also as a result of the assignment of the related credits, and the indemnities obtained, also in insurance form, by way of compensation for damages consisting in the loss of income, excluding employees from permanent disability or death, constitute income in the same category as those replaced or lost. “.

In other words, the sums deriving from the so-called loss of profit must be subject to the tax regime of belonging to the replaced or lost income, otherwise, if the aforementioned sums are recognized as compensation by a so-called emerging damage, the same must be considered excluded from the application of the tax pursuant to art. 49 TUIR and, therefore, exempt from withholding taxes or contributions.

Continue reading the full version published in ll Quotidiano del Lavoro of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…