Categories: Insights


12 May 2011

CONSOLIDATED ACT ON APPRENTICESHIP

The novelties which will be introduced by the Consolidated act on the apprenticeship, which is under consideration by the experts of the Ministry of Labour, are certainly important. The general structure of the measure has the merit of having organized the different legislative and interpretative provisions of recent years. Article 2 is particularly interesting because establishes that the rules concerning the contract are completely submitted to proper inter-union agreements or to collective agreements concluded at national, local or company level. Another important aspect concerns the sanction regime: it is confirmed – on default of the training assignment for which the employer is responsible and which prevents the achievement of the contract purposes – the previous sanction regime but the inspector, before proceeding with the sanction application, has to “oblige” the employer, by an order disposition, to execute the not performed training within an appropriate period. Furthermore, for any breach of the collective agreement provisions (i.e. lack of the written form for the contract and for the individual plan, of the prohibition of paying by the piece, of the professional status and of the tutor presence), the employer shall be punished by a pecuniary administrative sanction from Eur 100 to Eur 600 and, in case of relapse, from Eur 300 to Eur 1,500. The law also states that the contract is open-ended for all three types of apprenticeship. It still holds that in each of the mentioned three types there will be a period during which the employer can freely withdraw from the contact: for example, at the maximum period of three years for professional qualification apprenticeship; at the end of the maximum period of training equal to six years in the professionalizing contract.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…