Categories: Insights


10 Jun 2015

JOBS ACT: WITH THE NEW ARTICLE 4, LAW 300/1970 FOR WORK INSTRUMENTS AN INFORMATION SHEET IS SUFFICIENT

The draft of the legislative decree on simplifications, rejected in its first draft by the Government last 11 June, enacting article 1, paragraph 7, letter f) of Law 183/2014, rewrites the text of the Workers’ Statute in terms of remote controls. In its new formulation basically the trade union and/or authorisation procedure handled by the local employment office (DTl) for installation of audio-visual systems shall remain the same, while provisions will be introduced regarding work instruments. For the latter (e.g. PCs, tablets or mobile phones) no trade union agreement will be necessary, but to implement the instructions provided by the Authority for Privacy in recent years, the employer will be liable for providing adequate information on the use or the instruments and collected data as well as on control procedures. Lastly, the new text of article 4 Law 300/1970 expressly includes the option of using the data collected by the employer for all purposes connected with the employment, and thus even in terms of disciplinary issues. The new provisions, if they are approved at the terms described above, introduce a clear simplification on the subject and bring it up to date. The reform basically entails a “modernisation” of the laws on controls, making it less restrictive compared to the normal dynamics of current company situations and, de facto, implementing legal orientations that have been confirmed progressively. This intervention generated harsh criticism from those who consider the protection of workers’ privacy weakened, which, nevertheless, is believed will be protected by the Authority, which, with its directives, will act as an attentive supervisor.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…