Categories: Insights, Legislation


2 Apr 2018

The draft legislative decree implementing GDPR has been approved

On 22 March 2018, the Council of Ministers has approved the draft legislative decree laying down provisions on the adaptation of the national laws to the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data (the “Regulation”). The draft legislative decree peremptorily sets out that effective from the following 25 May Legislative Decree 196/2003 (so-called “Privacy Code”) shall be deemed repealed by such decree and by the Regulation, thus definitely clearing all the doubts arisen in recent times. The most relevant novelties include a broad decriminalization in case of violation of the “new” rules, in consideration of the strong dissuasive effect exerted by the administrative penalties in the light of Article 83 of the Regulation. Instances of infringement that, due to the particularly detrimental impact they may have on the activity of the Data Protection Authority remain in force. Therefore any individuals who in the proceedings before the Data Protection Authority render misrepresentations or intentionally cause interruption of, or disrupt, the regular performance of duties or exercise of powers of the Authority shall be punished with imprisonment.  Finally, it should be noted that the draft legislative decree provides for the “non-usability of data” as one would logically expect, as a direct and immediate consequence of any unlawful use of data, which, together with the administrative penalties, is an ex-post measure protecting the parties involved. It shall be understood that the draft might be amended before its final approval.

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…