Categories: Insights, Legislation


1 May 2017

The Legislative Decree that amends the procedures for the fight against bribery and corruption in the private sector has been approved. There is news also for the Organizational Models

On 30 March 2017, Legislative Decree No. 38/2017, related to the fight against bribery and corruption in the private sector has been approved. This piece of legislation extends the range of active subjects committing the offence as detailed in art. 2635 of the civil code, including – in addition to those that hold actual key management and control roles within the company – all those that carry out any management function. In addition, the conducts that may be subjected to penalties are expanded, including, among others (I) mere solicitation of undue money and other benefits by company employees as well as (ii) the offer of undue money or other benefit by an external subject to the company employees so that they may carry out violations or omit to carry out acts according to the obligations of their office or loyalty obligations. The decree also amended the text of Law Decree No. 231/2001, amending letter s-bis of art. 25-ter, paragraph 1. Specifically (I) monetary fines already established for the predicate offence of “Corruption between private parties” have been increased, ranging now from a minimum of 400 up to a maximum of 600 units; and (ii) the predicate offence of “incitement to corruption between private parties” has been introduced. In this case, monetary fines range from 200 up to a maximum of 400 units. In both cases, in addition, disqualification penalties shall apply. Therefore, the management and control models already implemented will have to be updated in order not to fall under the aforementioned penalties.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…