Categories: Insights, Publications


7 Jul 2019

Organisational Model: necessary risk analysis (Newsletter Norme & Tributi n. 134 – Camera di Commercio Italo-Germanica – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Criminal Division of the Court of Cassation, by judgment 18842/2019, referring to the case law of the Joint Divisions, has again ruled on the subject of administrative liability of entities. Specifically, the Court of Cassation has affirmed that it is the responsibility of the entity – once it has ascertained that certain offences have been committed by top management who have acted in their own interests or to gain advantage – to prove “with full discharge of its liabilities” that it has adopted and effectively implemented, before the offence was committed, a model of organisation, management and control suitable for preventing offences of the type which has occurred. This is because, again according to the Court, the “fault of the organisation” derives from not having fulfilled the obligation to “adopt organisational and managerial precautions necessary for preventing offences appropriate for establishing the liability of the collective subject. These precautions should be highlighted in a document which identifies the risks and appropriate measures to counter them”. In effect, organisation, management and control Models cannot be separated from the precise and exhaustive mapping of risks and identification of suitable monitoring measures to prevent and contain them. These measures must be adequately described in a suitable document, which then becomes obligatory for all those who operate within the organisation of the entity, including those with top management positions.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…