Categories: Insights, Practice


25 Jun 2018

Lawfulness of the personal data processing through GPS, but with limitations

With its Decision No. 441 of 29 May 2018, the Data Protection Authority has admitted the possibility of personal data processing through a geographic positioning system installed on tablets and smartphones given to the employees of a company that renders private security guard and money & valuables transport services. The above provided that the company adopts a series of necessary measures, amongst which one may find: (a) the system configuration in such a way that (i) an icon is placed on the device showing that the localisation features is active, (ii) the deactivation of the localisation feature is allowed during the breaks granted from the respective jobs, and (iii) it is possible to black out the visibility of the geographic position, after a certain period of inactivity of the operator on the screen at the operations centre; (b) the identification of the time during which the data actually processed will be kept, by taking into account the pursued aims; (c) the appointment of the software supplier as outside data processor. Furthermore, the security guards will not have to be directly identified by the system and the access in real time to the localisation data made by the authorised staff from the operations centre will only be foreseen in case of need and emergency. In short, in order for geographic positioning systems to be lawful, the latter must not entail the tracking of staff and, therefore, the employer must not use them to observe the movements of employees.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…