Categories: Insights, Practice


25 Jun 2018

Lawfulness of the personal data processing through GPS, but with limitations

With its Decision No. 441 of 29 May 2018, the Data Protection Authority has admitted the possibility of personal data processing through a geographic positioning system installed on tablets and smartphones given to the employees of a company that renders private security guard and money & valuables transport services. The above provided that the company adopts a series of necessary measures, amongst which one may find: (a) the system configuration in such a way that (i) an icon is placed on the device showing that the localisation features is active, (ii) the deactivation of the localisation feature is allowed during the breaks granted from the respective jobs, and (iii) it is possible to black out the visibility of the geographic position, after a certain period of inactivity of the operator on the screen at the operations centre; (b) the identification of the time during which the data actually processed will be kept, by taking into account the pursued aims; (c) the appointment of the software supplier as outside data processor. Furthermore, the security guards will not have to be directly identified by the system and the access in real time to the localisation data made by the authorised staff from the operations centre will only be foreseen in case of need and emergency. In short, in order for geographic positioning systems to be lawful, the latter must not entail the tracking of staff and, therefore, the employer must not use them to observe the movements of employees.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…