Categories: Insights, Practice


20 Oct 2016

Privacy Authority approval of time-stamping Apps

After approval issued by the Privacy Authority, businesses may install an “app” on the smartphones of their staff to record the start and end of the work shift. What are the regulatory principles of such remote supervisory tools which, while practical for corporate efficiency, may affect the right to employee’s privacy? The monitoring app may store only data related to the location of work as well as the date and time of “virtual stamping”, but they cannot store the exact location of the employee. For the protection of the employees, in addition, the time-stamping app must be configured in such a way to prevent the processing, even if accidental, of other personal data contained in the device owned by the employee. In addition, employees must be adequately and fully informed about the type of data, purpose and methods of the processing, storage times, optional nature of the provision, and the persons responsible or in charge of the processing. The companies shall also ensure implementation of the security measures necessary to preserve data integrity and to prevent access to unauthorized persons. The judgment of the Privacy Authority contributes to develop the concept of “privacy by design”, balancing the interests of corporate efficiency and the protection of workers’ privacy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…