Italian Data Protection Authority (‘IDPA’): guidelines on the use of company email management programs and on so-called “metadata” retention have been updated following recent public consultation by the IDPA
With order no. 364 of 6 June 2024 called “Computer programs and services for the management of e-mail in the workplace and metadata processing”, the IDPA has returned to the topic of company e-mail metadata retention.
What is “metadata”?
“Metadata” does not mean information contained in the “body” of the email but rather the information relating to the sending, receiving and sorting the messages. This may include the email addresses of the sender and of the recipient, the IP addresses of the servers or clients involved in the routing of the message, the times of sending, retransmission or reception, the size of the message, the presence and size of any attachments and, in certain cases, depending on the email management system used, may also include the subject of the message sent or received.
How long can employers retain this information?
With respect to the IDPA’s guidelines before the public consultation, the guidelines of 6 June 2019 extended the retention period to 21 days.
This retention period is merely “indicative”.
Retention for longer is only permitted if specific conditions that make the extension necessary are satisfied and are adequately proven.
Applying the principle of accountability, it is therefore up to each employer to adopt all technical and organisational measures to ensure compliance with the principle of purpose limitation, selective accessibility by only authorised and adequately trained individuals and the tracking of access carried out.
These requirements must be met while keeping in mind that generalised metadata collection and retention can lead to indirect remote control of workers’ activities and, in this case, the safeguards provided for by Article 4 of the Workers’ Charter apply i.e., it is necessary to enter into a union agreement or, failing that, obtain authorisation from the National or Local Labour Inspectorate.
Please contact our Privacy Focus Team for further information.
At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…
The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…
Headnote In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…
The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…
The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…
Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…