Categories: Insights, Publications


4 Jun 2020

Reduction in worker wages, when is it lawful (Guida al Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 4 giugno 2020 – Vittorio De Luca e Antonella Iacobellis)

As known, in our legal system the general principle of irreducibility of remuneration is applicable whereby the worker has the right to receive the remuneration agreed upon with the employer.

In this regard, the Court of Turin, with the ruling no. 440 of 18 February 2015 had stated that “The principle of irreducibility of remuneration, set forth by art. 2103 of the Italian Civil Code, implies that remuneration agreed upon at the time of hiring cannot be reduced even following an agreement between the employer and employee and any agreement to the contrary is null and void in any case where the agreed upon compensation including for an individual contract is reduced” and had further explained that “in case of lawful exercise, by the employer, of the “ius variandi”, the guarantee of irreducibility of remuneration extends to the sole remuneration of the essential intrinsic professional qualities of the previous duties, but not those remuneration components that are paid to compensate particular procedures of the job, and i.e. extrinsic characteristics not correlated with the proposed professional qualities of the same and, as such, susceptible to reduction once those extrinsic characteristics that were compensated cease to exist in the new duties”.

Continue to read the full version of the article (in Italian).

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…