Categories: Insights, Publications

Tag: atto di delega, infortunio, sicurezza sul lavoro


14 Jan 2020

The members of the Board of Directors are always liable in the event of an accident, unless there a formal deed of proxy which cannot be substituted by de facto proxy (Il Quotidiano del Lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 14 January 2020 – Alberto De Luca, Luca Cairoli)

The Court of Cassation, with judgement no. 54 filed on 3 January 2020, returned to express its position regarding the distribution of responsibilities for accident prevention obligations in limited companies. Expressing a general principle, the Court first of all pointed out that in corporations the employer’s obligations under the law relating to the prevention of accidents”are incumbent on all members of the board of directors without distinction, except in the case of delegation, validly conferred, of the position of guarantee“. In the case in question, a managing director of a limited company had appealed against the ruling of the Florence Court of Appeal, confirming the judgement at first instance, by which he was held liable for the crime of injury through negligence, for having caused personal injury to a worker injured in the performance of his work by omissive conduct consisting in not having adequately fulfilled his obligations in terms of safety at work. The Managing Director appealed to the Court of Cassation against this decision. Specifically, the appellant complained first of all that the Court of Appeal, in attributing to him responsibility for the accident, had not taken into account that there were other persons within the company organisation specifically designated to manage employment relations in their entirety. In particular, the appellant managing director argued that in his case the principle of cumulative responsibility at the top management of the company should not apply, in the presence of a person outside the Board of Directors, acting as the person in charge, as this latter is also exclusively responsible for compliance with obligations regarding safety at work.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…