Categories: Insights · News, Interviews

Tag: contratti a termine, Dismissal


26 Feb 2024

The “Milleproroghe Decree” – the expert’s view: “How the new rules on fixed-term contracts work in practice” (ADNKronos – 22 February 2024, Vittorio De Luca)

“With the imminent conversion into law of the Italian Milleproroghe Decree, the extension of the deadline for entering into a fixed-term contract beyond 12 months, by agreement between the parties, is on its way. The extension granted by the decree will be from 30 April to 31 December 2024 and it will temporarily extend the period in which companies can extend fixed-term contracts up to a total of 24 months, if there are explicit technical, organisational or production needs”, Vittorio De Luca, lawyer and managing partner at De Luca & Partners, explains to Adnkronos/Labitalia.

“The purpose of the provision – explains Mr De Luca who is an expert in this field – is to give the stakeholders more time to adapt the collective bargaining agreements very few of which, for the time being, have introduced provisions on the reasons justifying fixed-term contracts, leaving many production sectors uncovered. In fact, as is well known, the latest amendment to the regulations governing fixed-term contracts was introduced by the Italian Employment Decree (Decree-Law no. 28/2023), which, by reformulating Article 19 of Italian Legislative Decree no. 81/2015, established an innovative regime in the event of continuation of the fixed-term contract beyond the term of 12 months”, he explains.

“The current version of the provision states that, after the first 12 months – for which no reason is required – the fixed-term relationship can continue (up to 24 months) only for the replacement of workers and in the cases provided for by collective bargaining. In the absence of provisions in collective bargaining agreements, on a temporary basis until 30 April 2024 (now extended to 31 December) technical, organisational or production reasons identified by the parties will also be sufficient”, concludes Mr. De Luca.

Press release:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…