Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Corte Europea, Datore di lavoro


6 Aug 2021

EU Court: The employer can prevent employees from wearing political, philosophical or religious symbols if needed (Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto – Il Sole 24 Ore, 6 August 2021 – Vittorio De Luca, Debhora Scarano)

The Court of Justice of the European Union looked at the delicate issue of using religious symbols in the workplace under a ruling published on 15 July 2021, in Joined Cases C-804/18 and C-341/19. According to the Court, the prohibition of wearing any visible form of expression of political, philosophical or religious beliefs in the workplace can be justified by the employer’s need “to appear neutral before customers or prevent social conflicts.”

The decision of the European judges stems from an action brought before the Hamburg Labour Court by two female employees of a company incorporated under German Law, who were asked not to wear conspicuous signs indicating their religious affiliation.

The referring courts decided to question the Court on the interpretation of Directive 2000/78. They asked whether a company’s internal rule prohibiting workers from wearing visible signs of political, philosophical or religious beliefs in the workplace constituted direct or indirect discrimination on grounds of belief. In addition, they wanted to know under what conditions any treatment difference indirectly based on belief resulting from such a rule could be justified, and what factors should be considered when examining the appropriateness of such a treatment difference.

The EU Courts have held that company regulations described above do not constitute direct discrimination on the grounds of belief against workers, provided that “that rule is applied in a general and indiscriminate manner.” According to the Court, such imposition does not entail indirect discrimination as the different treatment imposed is limited to what is strictly necessary and is justified by a policy of neutrality towards customers or users which meets an employer’s need. The burden of proof of this is on the employer.

Continue reading the full version published in  Norme & Tributi Plus Diritto of Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Gestione della posta elettronica aziendale dopo la cessazione del rapporto di lavoro: il Garante estende il diritto di accesso a tutte le mail della casella e-mail nominativa 

“Il lavoratore può accedere ai messaggi del proprio account e-mail aziendale e ai documenti presenti nel pc dopo la fine del rapporto di lavoro. Eventuali limitazioni devono essere…

27 Apr 2026

NASpI e dimissioni per trasferimento oltre 50km: per la Cassazione non basta la distanza, va provato l’inadempimento del datore di lavoro 

Con la recente ordinanza n. 10559 del 21 aprile 2026, la Corte di Cassazione si è pronunciata in tema di indennità di disoccupazione (NASpI) a seguito di dimissioni per giusta causa dovute a trasferimento del…

27 Apr 2026

Lo sai che… il patto di prova è nullo se le mansioni sono indicate in modo generico? 

Il Tribunale di Milano, Sezione Lavoro, con sentenza n. 683 del 3 aprile 2026, ha ribadito che il patto di prova è valido solo se contiene una specifica…

17 Apr 2026

Criminal penalties are being introduced for those who fail to protect remote workers (The Platform, 17 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Martina De Angeli)

The provision amends Legislative Decree 81/2008 by introducing a new Article 3, paragraph 7-bis, which makes compliance with safety obligations conditional upon the delivery—at least annually—of a written…

15 Apr 2026

Dismissal deemed valid based on a message sent in a WhatsApp chat (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7982 of March 31, 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section) held that a message sent within a private chat may constitute just cause for…