Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: Corte di Cassazione, Dismissal, Licenziamento


29 May 2024

Employer bears burden of proof of payment of remuneration

By order no. 10663 of 19 April 2024, the Italian Court of Cassation stated that the employer bears the burden of proof in proving that remuneration has been properly paid.

The facts of the case

The worker filed an application for summary judgment to obtain an order against the company to pay the amount indicated in the November 2015 pay slip.

In the first instance, the first instance Court found that the payment was due to the worker.

The company appealed to the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal upheld the first instance decision, ruling that the employer had not discharged its burden of proof relating to proving in court that the sum had been paid.

The Italian Court of Cassation’s decision

The Italian Court of Cassation – confirming the Court of Appeal decision – preliminarily noted that, once the existence of an employment relationship has been ascertained, the employer is under a strict duty of proof to establish that the remuneration has been paid. The employer can do this by means of the normal documentation i.e., regulatory pay slips bearing the worker’s signature. If the employer cannot prove that it has paid the remuneration due to the employee through pay slips, it must provide appropriate documentation of the relevant payments that it has made in relation to the employee’s individual claims.

According to the Italian Court of Cassation, giving employees at the time of payment of remuneration a statement containing an indication of all the constituent elements of the remuneration does not prove payment where the worker states that it is inconsistent with the remuneration actually paid.

According to the Italian Court of Cassation, the burden falls on the worker only if he/she, after signing the pay slip, alleges that the remuneration indicated in the pay slip is inconsistent with the remuneration paid.

As the present case did not fall within the latter situation, the Italian Court of Cassation rejected the company’s appeal.

Other related insights:

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Contact

    Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

    Fill in the form

    More news and insights

    6 Feb 2026

    Pay equity and transparency: draft implementing decree presented

    Italy is among the first Member States to have adopted the draft implementing legislative decree of EU Directive 2023/970, which yesterday received its initial approval from the Council…

    30 Jan 2026

    A conviction for stalking can justify dismissal for just cause

    With Ordinance No. 32952 of 17 December 2025, the Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, ruled that a final conviction for stalking and abuse can justify dismissal for just…

    30 Jan 2026

    We continue to be a Great Place to Work!

    For the third consecutive year, De Luca & Partners has been awarded the prestigious Great Place to Work® certification, a significant recognition of the value we place on…

    29 Jan 2026

    Italian Supreme Court: Employer Monitoring and the Use of Corporate Chats for Disciplinary Purposes

    Corporate chats “intended for work-related communications by employees accessing them through company accounts constitute work tools, pursuant to Article 4, paragraph 2, of Law No. 300 of 1970,…

    28 Jan 2026

    Anti-union conduct: the Supreme Court moves beyond formalism and focuses on substance

    With order no. 789 of 14 January 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of anti-union conduct by employers in relation to information and consultation obligations on…

    27 Jan 2026

    DID YOU KNOW THAT… the use of artificial intelligence may justify a dismissal for objective justified reason?

    With Judgment No. 9135 of November 19, 2025, the Labour Section of the Court of Rome held that the dismissal for objective justified reason (i.e. “giustificato motivo oggettivo”,…