Categories: News, Events


10 Jan 2019

HR Breakfast: “Dismissal: the latest safeguards, in light of recent legislative measures and a judgement of the Constitutional Court” – 29 January 2019

Law no. 98 of 9 August, converting Law Decree no. 87/2018 (the so-called Dignity Decree) with amendments, was published on Official Gazette no. 186/2018.

 

While not altering the method of determination – linked to seniority – referred to in art. 3 of Legislative Decree no. 23 dated 4 March 2015, the Dignity Decree establishes that compensation in cases of wrongful dismissal should be equivalent to at least 6 months’ salaries (compared to 4 under the former legislation) and at most 36 months’ salaries (compared to 24), based on the final salary used to calculate severance pay.

 

The method for determining compensation, instead, required the involvement of the Constitutional Court.

 

On 14 November last, Official Gazette no. 45 published the operative part of judgement no. 194/2018 with which the Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of art. 3, para. 1, of Legislative Decree No. 23/2015 exclusively as regards the wording “equivalent to two months’ salaries, based on the final salary used to calculate severance pay for every year of service”.

 

According to the Constitutional Court, the method for quantifying compensation under Legislative Decree No. 23/2015, also in the version amended by the Dignity Decree, results in a “rigid compensation system that applies uniformly to all workers and cannot be scaled based on parameters other than seniority of service. In this way, compensation becomes a standard, flat-rate liquidation…of the damage to workers arising from wrongful dismissal from permanent employment”.

 

This contrasts with the principles of equality and reasonableness, and therefore the determination of damage in the event of wrongful dismissal should be a matter for the Courts.

 

As a result of the ascertained unconstitutionality of the Legislative Decree, today, the courts also have ample discretion over the dismissal of resources hired after 7 March 2015, which discretion – according to the Constitutional Court – shall have to be exercised “within the minimum and maximum limits of compensation (the new limits dictated by the Dignity Decree – ed.)”, “taking into account a number of criteria in addition to seniority of service”.

 

The courts, therefore, may exercise discretion in determining the amount of compensation due to workers in the event of wrongful dismissal, with the difference that workers hired after the entry into force of the Jobs Act may – in certain cases – be awarded greater compensation than those hired before 7 March 2015, thereby falling under the provisions of art. 18 of Law 300/1970.

 

With Lawyers Enrico De Luca and Stefania Raviele, we intend to review the situation on workers’ safeguards and on the risks of a lawsuit due to wrongful dismissal.

 

 

 

 

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…