Categories: Insights, Publications · News, Publications

Tag: accertamento ispettivo, obbligo contributivo, onere probatorio


2 Dec 2020

The Supreme Court once again dwells on the value of the declarations made during the inspection (Il Quotidiano del lavoro de Il Sole 24 Ore, 2 December 2020 – Vittorio De Luca, Antonella Iacobellis)

The Court of Cassation no. 24208 – 02/11/2020 focused again on the value of the statements made during the inspection for the judge called to assess the existence of the employer’s obligation to pay contributions, especially if the latter has not fulfilled the burden of proof.

The Supreme Court held that

  • “The principle of self-sufficiency of the appeal in cassation […]requires the applicant to specifically indicate the facts and evidence allegedly neglected by the court of appeal […]. Moreover, the requirement of self-sufficiency cannot be considered satisfied if the appellant inserts the photographic reproduction of one or more documents (in this case several dozen), entrusting the Court with the selection of the relevant parts […] ”;
  • the judge can attribute greater importance to the circumstances reported by the interested parties to the minutes takers, in the immediacy of the facts, rather than to the circumstances reported by them in the deposition during an hearing.

Read the full version of the article in Italian published by Il Quotidiano del Lavoro – Il Sole 24 Ore.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

12 Oct 2026

“AI tools, remote work and confidential data: employer liability in a borderless environment” – IBA Conference 2026

At the IBA Annual Conference 2026 in Copenhagen, our Managing Partner Vittorio De Luca moderated a panel on one of the most pressing challenges facing employers today: the…

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…