Categories: Insights, Publications


20 Jun 2017

Illicit use of the corporate phone legitimises dismissal for just cause (Il Sole 24 Ore – Il Quotidiano del Lavoro, 21 June 2017 – Vittorio De Luca, Elena Cannone)

The Labour section of the Court of Cassation, with judgement No. 4262 dated February 17, 2017, addressed the issue of the lawfulness of dismissal for just cause ordered to an employee holding a middle-management position for the personal use of a mobile phone owned by the employer and provided for business reasons. The Court of Cassation, believing appropriate the ruling of the judges on the matter, excluded the alleged breach of Article 4 of the Workers’ Statute claimed by the employee on the basis of the fact that the employer, in order to ascertain the unlawful conduct, did not use any audiovisual equipment or other equipment designed for remote control of the work activity, but based itself on the results emerged from telephone call logs. In fact, according to the Court, “it is entirely legitimate that the employer, in monitoring its activity, may detect anomalies in the use of assets provided to its employees, such as mobile phones, from which logs, related to voice or data traffic (provided in the invoice, moreover with appropriate omissions and redactions) may lead to detecting anomalies such as to induce the employer to believe that there may be abuses performed by the user of the devices”. The Court of Cassation, therefore, confirmed the full legitimacy of the dismissal ordered, considering the dismissal fully proportionate to the offence committed by the employee.

Read the original version of this article opublished on Il Sole 24 Ore and  Il Quotidiano del Lavoro.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…