Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Autorità Garante, data protection, GPS


3 Apr 2025

GPS and company vehicles. Continuous tracking exposes the company to risk

On January 16, 2025, the Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) issued a decision, publicly disclosed through its institutional newsletter on March 21, 2025, imposing a fine of €50,000 on a transport company for unlawfully monitoring approximately 50 employees using a GPS system installed in company vehicles. The Authority identified several violations following the receipt of a complaint filed by a former employee, who (i) complained about not having received the information required under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “Regulation”) on personal data protection, and (ii) reported the failure of the employer to activate the guarantee procedure as required under Article 4 of Law No. 300/1970 (i.e. “Workers Statute” or in Italian parlance “Statuto dei Lavoratori”).

The investigation revealed that the GPS system had been installed for the protection of company assets, workplace safety, and organizational and production needs, as indicated in the authorization request submitted to the relevant Territorial Labor Inspectorate (i.e. “ITL”). Specifically, the system allowed the Company to acquire information about the vehicle’s location, its status (on or off), telemetry data, and indirectly, the drivers’ activities. This information was continuously collected by the system, though delayed by 3/5 minutes, and included work breaks. All data were retained for a period of 180 days.

Based on the findings, the Italian Data Protection Authority observed that:

  • The collection of information, such as tracking the vehicle’s location during work breaks, allows for continuous monitoring of employee activities, violating the data minimisation principle (Article 5, para. 1(c) of the Regulation), which requires that the data collected be “adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed”. The Italian Data Protection Authority also emphasized that the vehicle’s location should generally not be monitored continuously, but only when necessary to achieve legitimate business purposes.
  • The retention of the data for an extended period is not in compliance with the principles of data minimisation and data retention limitation.
  • The specific functionalities of the GPS system did not conform to the guarantees set out in the authorization granted by the Territorial Labor Inspectorate, particularly concerning the non-continuous monitoring of the geolocated vehicle, data anonymization, and the adoption of technological solutions to prevent “the processing of excessive, irrelevant, or unnecessary data beyond the purposes pursued by the data controller”.

In summary, the data processing was conducted in violation of both privacy regulations and the authorization granted, thereby contravening the principle of lawfulness of processing.

Considering the numerous and serious violations identified, the Authority imposed a €50,000 fine on the company and ordered it to provide proper notification to employees and to align its GPS data practices with the guarantees prescribed in the authorization issued by the Territorial Labor Inspectorate.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…

30 Jul 2026

Did you know that… an employee’s natural incapacity does not prevent the time limit for challenging a dismissal from running?

In judgment no. 23486 of 18 July 2026, the Joint Chambers of the Italian Supreme Court (i.e. “Corte di Cassazione”) held that the natural incapacity of an employee…

22 Jul 2026

An employee may not steer clients toward a competitor before resigning (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia, 22 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 1723 of 26 May 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Corte di Cassazione) confirmed the liability of an employee who, prior to the termination of his…

20 Jul 2026

Access to Naspi (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 20 July 2026 – Vittorio De Luca e Alessandra Zilla)

Regulatory Framework  The New Social Insurance for Employment (NASpI), introduced by Legislative Decree No. 22 of 4 March 2015, is the primary income support scheme for employees who…