Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Autorità Garante, data protection, GPS


3 Apr 2025

GPS and company vehicles. Continuous tracking exposes the company to risk

On January 16, 2025, the Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) issued a decision, publicly disclosed through its institutional newsletter on March 21, 2025, imposing a fine of €50,000 on a transport company for unlawfully monitoring approximately 50 employees using a GPS system installed in company vehicles. The Authority identified several violations following the receipt of a complaint filed by a former employee, who (i) complained about not having received the information required under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “Regulation”) on personal data protection, and (ii) reported the failure of the employer to activate the guarantee procedure as required under Article 4 of Law No. 300/1970 (i.e. “Workers Statute” or in Italian parlance “Statuto dei Lavoratori”).

The investigation revealed that the GPS system had been installed for the protection of company assets, workplace safety, and organizational and production needs, as indicated in the authorization request submitted to the relevant Territorial Labor Inspectorate (i.e. “ITL”). Specifically, the system allowed the Company to acquire information about the vehicle’s location, its status (on or off), telemetry data, and indirectly, the drivers’ activities. This information was continuously collected by the system, though delayed by 3/5 minutes, and included work breaks. All data were retained for a period of 180 days.

Based on the findings, the Italian Data Protection Authority observed that:

  • The collection of information, such as tracking the vehicle’s location during work breaks, allows for continuous monitoring of employee activities, violating the data minimisation principle (Article 5, para. 1(c) of the Regulation), which requires that the data collected be “adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed”. The Italian Data Protection Authority also emphasized that the vehicle’s location should generally not be monitored continuously, but only when necessary to achieve legitimate business purposes.
  • The retention of the data for an extended period is not in compliance with the principles of data minimisation and data retention limitation.
  • The specific functionalities of the GPS system did not conform to the guarantees set out in the authorization granted by the Territorial Labor Inspectorate, particularly concerning the non-continuous monitoring of the geolocated vehicle, data anonymization, and the adoption of technological solutions to prevent “the processing of excessive, irrelevant, or unnecessary data beyond the purposes pursued by the data controller”.

In summary, the data processing was conducted in violation of both privacy regulations and the authorization granted, thereby contravening the principle of lawfulness of processing.

Considering the numerous and serious violations identified, the Authority imposed a €50,000 fine on the company and ordered it to provide proper notification to employees and to align its GPS data practices with the guarantees prescribed in the authorization issued by the Territorial Labor Inspectorate.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

20 May 2026

Webinar “May 1st Decree: Key Updates and what’s New” –  HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

On the occasion of our webinar “An HR Coffee with De Luca Partners,” the speakers Silvia Zulato, Senior Associate, and Alessandro Riccardo Polli from the Labour Consulting Division…

12 May 2026

Legitimate dismissal for false attendance reporting and misuse of access system data (Camera di Commercio Francese in Italia – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 7985 of 31 March 2026, the Italian Supreme Court – Labour Section – confirmed the lawfulness of a dismissal for just cause imposed on an…

30 Apr 2026

Webinar “Bonuses: What Do You Need to Know About Objectives?” – HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners

Yesterday, during our first webinar “HR Coffee with De Luca & Partners", the speakers Vittorio De Luca, Managing Partner, and Alessandra Zilla, Managing Associate at De Luca &…

27 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the Italian Data Protection Authority extends the right of access to all emails in the individual email account 

“An employee may access the messages in their corporate email account and the documents stored on their computer after the termination of employment. Any limitations must be justified by specific…

27 Apr 2026

Unemployment benefits and resignation following transfer beyond 50 km: distance alone is not sufficient, employer’s breach must be proven  

With order no. 10559 of 21 April 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of unemployment benefits (i.e. “NASpI”) in the context of resignations for just cause following…

27 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… the probationary period clause is null and void if the duties are described in generic terms? 

The Court of Milan, with judgment no. 683 of 3 April 2026, reaffirmed that a probationary clause (i.e. “patto di prova”) is valid only if it contains a specific indication of the duties subject to…