Categories: Insights


12 May 2011

CONSOLIDATED ACT ON APPRENTICESHIP

The novelties which will be introduced by the Consolidated act on the apprenticeship, which is under consideration by the experts of the Ministry of Labour, are certainly important. The general structure of the measure has the merit of having organized the different legislative and interpretative provisions of recent years. Article 2 is particularly interesting because establishes that the rules concerning the contract are completely submitted to proper inter-union agreements or to collective agreements concluded at national, local or company level. Another important aspect concerns the sanction regime: it is confirmed – on default of the training assignment for which the employer is responsible and which prevents the achievement of the contract purposes – the previous sanction regime but the inspector, before proceeding with the sanction application, has to “oblige” the employer, by an order disposition, to execute the not performed training within an appropriate period. Furthermore, for any breach of the collective agreement provisions (i.e. lack of the written form for the contract and for the individual plan, of the prohibition of paying by the piece, of the professional status and of the tutor presence), the employer shall be punished by a pecuniary administrative sanction from Eur 100 to Eur 600 and, in case of relapse, from Eur 300 to Eur 1,500. The law also states that the contract is open-ended for all three types of apprenticeship. It still holds that in each of the mentioned three types there will be a period during which the employer can freely withdraw from the contact: for example, at the maximum period of three years for professional qualification apprenticeship; at the end of the maximum period of training equal to six years in the professionalizing contract.
Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 April 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 March 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

10 Mar 2026

The transfer of the employee is lawful when there is incompatibility with the company environment (Camera di Commercio Italo-Francese, 10 March 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Silvia Zulato)

With Order No. 4198 of 25 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court (Court of Cassation) – Labour Section – reaffirmed that a situation of environmental incompatibility may justify…