Categories: Insights, Legislation


25 Jul 2016

Legislative Decree No. 136/2016 as a panacea for the unlawful triangulations used in cross-border postings of workers

On 22 July 2016 Legislative Decree No. 136 that has redefined cross-border postings has been given final approval. The Legislative Decree implementing Directive 2014/67/EU, addresses all cases of irregular posting, encouraging cooperation between States in determining the authenticity of the same. The regulations apply to companies within the EU that post one or more workers in Italy to another company, including employment agencies and internal mobility within the same company. The powerful mechanism underlying the decree is structured on a set of initiative powers referred to the supervisory bodies. It refers to investigations geared, amongst other things, to verifying: the place where the company has its registered-administrative office and where it is registered; the place where the workers are hired and where they are posted to; the fact that the worker carries out his normal working activity in the State from where he was posted. If the posting is found not to be authentic, the worker will be considered as an employee of the entity which has made use of his service, also imposing considerable financial penalties on the company making the posting and on the one where the worker is posted to. It would seem, then, to be the end of the season where “illicit personnel triangulations” were a valuable mechanism for bypassing the onerous contributory schemes in Italy.

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Oct 2026

Corporate e-mail and defensive monitoring: when the GDPR and employment law lead to different outcomes 

The Piaggio case clearly illustrates how the same set of facts can give rise to profoundly different assessments depending on the perspective adopted. In its decision of 13…

1 Oct 2026

NASpI and Reinstatement: the Employee’s Election Causes Loss of the Benefit 

Headnote   In its recent judgment No. 24981 of 3 September 2026, the Italian Supreme Court held that, where a dismissal is set aside with an order of reinstatement…

1 Oct 2026

Did you know that… testimony given in court may have disciplinary relevance and, in the most serious cases, justify dismissal? 

The Italian Supreme Court, Labour Section, by order no. 25687 of 22 September 2026, addressed the issue of the disciplinary relevance of statements made by an employee in…

29 Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the workplace: how to govern risks, data, and security (Agenda digitale, 29 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Martina De Angeli)

The spread of artificial intelligence tools used without corporate authorization exposes businesses to risks involving personal data, confidential information, know-how, and cybersecurity. To govern Shadow AI, organizations need…

24 Sep 2026

The concept of “territorial scope” in a non-compete agreement (Top24 Lavoro Ai – Il Sole 24 Ore, 24 September 2026 – Vittorio De Luca and Alessandro Ferrari)

Interpretative issues in light of the most recent case law on the nullity of non-compete agreements due to the indeterminacy of territorial scope By an order issued on…

16 Sep 2026

Did you know that… repeated violations of company procedures may justify the dismissal of a store manager?

The Italian Supreme Court (Labour Section), in Order No. 25231 of 11 September 2026, upheld the lawfulness of the dismissal for just cause of a store manager who…