Categories: News

Tag: Corte Costituzionale


27 May 2022

Financial-based dismissals: a “manifest” lack of the fact is not necessary to obtain reinstatement protection

The Constitutional Court, in ruling 125 filed on 19 May 2022, expressed its opinion on paragraph 7 of art. 18, of law no. 300/1970 which recognises the reinstatement protection in cases of dismissal for justified objective reason, only if it is established that there is a “manifest lack” of the fact underlying the dismissal.

The Constitutional Court declared the above paragraph unconstitutional, limited to the wordmanifest.” The Court specified that the fact underlying the dismissal is to be “traced back to what pertains to the effectiveness and genuineness of the entrepreneurial choice.” On these aspects the judge is called upon to carry out an assessment of legitimacy that cannot “encroach onto a review of appropriateness and opportunity” (see ruling no. 59 of 2021).

The manifest lack of the fact requirement is vague and lends itself to uncertainties, with consequent treatment inequalities. The existence of a fact is a difficult notion to classify because it suggests “a clear alternative, which the court’s assessment is called upon to resolve in positive or negative terms.”

The ruling stated that the manifest lack criterion, “is unconventional in the system of remedies, usually focused on the varying seriousness of the defects and not on an accidental contingency, linked to the linearity and celerity of the assessment.”

In disputes concerning dismissals for objective justified reason, there is complex evidence. The parties and the judge, must ascertain the existence or lack of a fact, which is a complex operation, and engage “in a further verification of the precise degree of the possible lack of the fact.” This would imply an “unreasonable and disproportionate burden” on the proceedings. The vagueness of the requirement would thus be accompanied by an unreasonable complication of the proceedings.

The Constitutional Court identified an imbalance between the goals the legislature had set (consisting in a fairer distribution of protections, through quicker and more easily predictable decisions) and the means adopted to achieve them.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

1 Sep 2026

Company files deleted from the PC: dismissal lawful even without proof of damage

The matter arises from the disciplinary dismissal of an employee performing general secretarial duties who, upon returning the company computer following a change in her duties, handed back…

1 Sep 2026

Overtime work: a summary schedule is not enough, employees must provide strict evidence of both the hours worked and the extent of the overtime performed

With order no. 20700 of 18 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court once again addressed the issue of overtime work, reiterating that employees claiming overtime pay must strictly…

1 Sep 2026

Did you know that… an individual allowance that has remained unchanged for years may become non-absorbable?

In judgment no. 24475 of 5 August 2026, the Employment Section of the Italian Supreme Court confirmed that an individual allowance (i.e. “superminimo”), although normally subject to the…

3 Aug 2026

Pay Transparency: the first requests from employees are starting to arrive (Il Sole 24 Ore, 3 august 2026 – Vittorio De Luca)

Two months after the decree. Since Legislative Decree 96/2026 came into force on 7 June, according to a flash survey conducted by GIDP, 8% of HR directors have…

30 Jul 2026

Corporate controls and data protection: what balance?

A recent judgment of the Court of Pisa, No. 800 of 13 June 2026, addresses a topic of particular interest for companies: the delicate balance between the protection…

30 Jul 2026

Unfair dismissal and reinstatement: the employee must repay the payment in lieu of notice

With order no. 22187 of 28 June 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether payment in lieu of notice paid to an employee must be…