Categories: Insights, Practice

Tag: Autorità Garante, data protection, GPS


3 Apr 2025

GPS and company vehicles. Continuous tracking exposes the company to risk

On January 16, 2025, the Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) issued a decision, publicly disclosed through its institutional newsletter on March 21, 2025, imposing a fine of €50,000 on a transport company for unlawfully monitoring approximately 50 employees using a GPS system installed in company vehicles. The Authority identified several violations following the receipt of a complaint filed by a former employee, who (i) complained about not having received the information required under Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (the “Regulation”) on personal data protection, and (ii) reported the failure of the employer to activate the guarantee procedure as required under Article 4 of Law No. 300/1970 (i.e. “Workers Statute” or in Italian parlance “Statuto dei Lavoratori”).

The investigation revealed that the GPS system had been installed for the protection of company assets, workplace safety, and organizational and production needs, as indicated in the authorization request submitted to the relevant Territorial Labor Inspectorate (i.e. “ITL”). Specifically, the system allowed the Company to acquire information about the vehicle’s location, its status (on or off), telemetry data, and indirectly, the drivers’ activities. This information was continuously collected by the system, though delayed by 3/5 minutes, and included work breaks. All data were retained for a period of 180 days.

Based on the findings, the Italian Data Protection Authority observed that:

  • The collection of information, such as tracking the vehicle’s location during work breaks, allows for continuous monitoring of employee activities, violating the data minimisation principle (Article 5, para. 1(c) of the Regulation), which requires that the data collected be “adequate, relevant and limited to what is necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are processed”. The Italian Data Protection Authority also emphasized that the vehicle’s location should generally not be monitored continuously, but only when necessary to achieve legitimate business purposes.
  • The retention of the data for an extended period is not in compliance with the principles of data minimisation and data retention limitation.
  • The specific functionalities of the GPS system did not conform to the guarantees set out in the authorization granted by the Territorial Labor Inspectorate, particularly concerning the non-continuous monitoring of the geolocated vehicle, data anonymization, and the adoption of technological solutions to prevent “the processing of excessive, irrelevant, or unnecessary data beyond the purposes pursued by the data controller”.

In summary, the data processing was conducted in violation of both privacy regulations and the authorization granted, thereby contravening the principle of lawfulness of processing.

Considering the numerous and serious violations identified, the Authority imposed a €50,000 fine on the company and ordered it to provide proper notification to employees and to align its GPS data practices with the guarantees prescribed in the authorization issued by the Territorial Labor Inspectorate.

Other related insights:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Contact

Need information? Write to us and our team of experts will respond as soon as possible.

Fill in the form

More news and insights

8 Apr 2026

Management of corporate email after termination of employment: the limits according to the Italian Data Protection Authority

The Italian Data Protection Authority (i.e. “Garante per la protezione dei dati personali”) has once again provided guidance on how employers should manage corporate email accounts after the…

8 Apr 2026

Oral dismissal: the burden of proof on the employee

With order no. 4077 of 23 February 2026, the Italian Supreme Court addressed the issue of oral dismissal, holding that an employee challenging the termination of the employment…

8 Apr 2026

DID YOU KNOW THAT… incompatibility between colleagues may justify the transfer of an employee? 

The Italian Supreme Court, with order no. 4198 of 25 February 2026, held that an employee’s transfer may be lawfully implemented also in the presence of a situation…

7 Apr 2026

The boundary between rest and inactivity in the management of working hours (AIDP – HR Online, 7 aprile 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alesia Hima)

In the organizational language of companies, terms such as “breaks,” “waiting times,” or “downtime” are often used. In operational practice, these expressions tend to be treated almost as…

17 Mar 2026

Equal pay: green light for the decree on pay equality and wage transparency (People are People, 16 marzo 2026 – Claudia Cerbone, Martina De Angeli)

Claudia Cerbone and Martina De Angeli, professionals at the De Luca & Partners firm, author this article dedicated to the draft legislative decree approved last February 5 by…

16 Mar 2026

Illegitimacy of staff leasing due to violation of the principle of temporariness (Top 24 Lavoro, 27 febbraio 2026 – Vittorio De Luca, Alessandra Zilla)

With judgment no. 4493 of December 19, 2025, the Court of Milan addressed the issue of indefinite-term labor supply (so-called staff leasing). In particular, the Court clarified that,…