De Luca & Partners’ Think Tank manages and coordinates research, training (internal and external) and editorial activities on labour law matters, protection of personal data and administrative liability of entities.
De Luca & Partners invests in researching and disseminating Employment Law material and for this reason collaborates with Il Sole 24 Ore and with the main employment law publications.
INPS, with message 16961 of October 22, provided some clarifications about the special indemnity granted to project employees (so called “co.co.pro.”) by Fornero Reform.
Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 20913 of September 12, 2013, stated that technical, organizational and productive reasons justifying the transfer of the employee must be described in detail and must not be generic.
The last version of the Stability Decree, issued by the Government on October 16, confirms the change of the Article 2, paragraph 30, of Fornero Reform on “company’s benefit” for the transformation of fixed term contracts, by deleting the words “within the limits of the last six months”.
Court of Cassation, with sentence no. 21922 of September 25, 2013, rejected the appeal of a company against the decision of the Court of Appeal which stated that employee’s behavior who claimed her new duties must be assigned in writing is lawful.
The Ministry of Labour, with note n. 31/0005426 of October 4, provided answers to some questions on the minimum period of time between two fixed term contracts.
Income revenue authority, with note no. 49/E/2013, stated that expenses reimbursement paid to self-employees have not be taxed as different incomes if the performance is free.
The requests for hiring bonus (of young people aged under 30 years old) have arrived to 7,841 in three days, far away from the overall capacity guaranteed by the budget for 2013 which covers about 20 thousands hiring or stabilization.
Court of cassation, with sentence of September 30, 2013, no. 22321, stated that the ten-year blameless behavior and the will of refunding the damage caused to the employer save the employee who pockets the reimbursement of a trip never done from the dismissal.
